Why Did This Order From Trump Go Unnoticed? : Trump Waives Important Environmental Reviews

Although this act hasn’t gotten an abundance of publicity on social platforms, it’s extremely crucial when it comes to the protection of our environment. Recently, Trump has directed federal agencies to bypass requirements of important environmental laws, leaving tons of organisms and ecosystems vulnerable to endangerment. Not only will this potentially hurt the lives of animals, but vulnerable communities could face tremendous impacts as well. Trump claims that this order was put into place to basically fast track the big, new, infrastructure projects, in order to boost the economy, hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic. Therefore, he’s really using this order to avoid time-consuming processes and enable building of transportation and energy infrastructure (like oil and gas pipelines, fossil fuel export terminals, highways, etc.)

NEPA

(image source: https://electrek.co/2020/04/10/egeb-white-house-nepa-email-address-department-energy-hydrokinetic-turbine-technology/amp/ )

Usually, building infrastructure like the examples previously stated, require long approval processes under the NEPA. The NEPA, or the National Environmental Policy Act, was signed into law by President Nixon in 1970. This law was put into place to promote efforts that will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and promote the quality of the human environment. This law also ensures that agencies consider significant environmental consequences of their proposed projects or actions and to inform the public about their decision making.

This law was put into place for very specific reasons and helps to ensure the quality of the environment we live in. When taking this law away, we’re all vulnerable to important decisions being gone unseen. More specifically, communities of color are more likely to be vulnerable to be impacted by the waiving of this law. This isn’t something to be discussed lightly because cities have documented way more cases in asthma and respiratory problems in children growing up surrounded by pollution. We need to be informed about decisions being made in our cities in order to ensure the safety of ourselves, children, and loved ones.

What Do Critics Say?

Many critics question the legality of Trumps recent decision; they claim the order would shut down input from those affected by such projects. This means that people or communities that live in areas affected by potential or current projects wouldn’t have a decision or receive notice about such actions. (Perhaps they’d receive notice about it but they’d really have no input on the situation.)

Critics also claim that this is Trump’s way of using the pandemic as a cover to weaken certain environmental laws that he has long opposed. They emphasize the fact that the Trump Administration has already tried speeding up NEPA reviews, claiming they’re “outrageously slow and burdensome.”

Statements From Significant Individuals

Gina McCarthy

Former EPA administrator and head of the Natural Resources Defense Council, Gina McCarthy, takes a strong stance on the situation. McCarthy states, “Instead of trying to ease the pain of a nation in crisis, Trump is focused on easing the pain of polluters.”

This statement emphasizes two different subjects; a crisis and polluters. Although, they’re both a crisis. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has clearly been the main focus in the past few months. Therefore, McCarthy defends the position of needing our president to focus more on helping people in this crisis, instead of helping businesses or industries that need to speed things up disregard any environmental reviews. McCarthy goes on to call the order an “abuse of emergency power”, and claims that blocking out environmental reviews is “utterly senseless.”

Raúl Grijalva

Another individual with a strong statement is Congressman Raúl Grijalva, a U.S. representative with the House Natural Resources Committee. He states, “Cutting NEPA takes away one of the few tools communities of color have to protect themselves and make their voices heard on federal decisions impacting them.”

When researching Grijalva, I came across his website where there’s a post including impactful words on this order placed by the Trump administration. He further discusses how this order will increase the power of industries that are responsible for pollution. This impacts communities in the area by exposing citizens to pollutants that produce illnesses. Therefore, the approach should not be accepted by any means due to the potential and expected negative outcomes.

A Similar Situation:

When comparing this order made by the current president to similar orders by past presidents, the limitations are more emphasized. For example, during the Obama administration in 2014, there was an expected volcanic eruption. So, the National Park Service received emergency exception to build an evacuation route. This volcano was expected to erupt 45 days after the exception was made to build the evacuation route. Therefore, a long process wasn’t possible. However, the agency did follow through with NEPA and involved the public, even with the emergency.

30 Days?

According to recent reports, the presidents order gives agencies thirty days to provide a summary report of projects. Some environmentalists say that the order is so broad, it may be unlawful. I think they say this because thirty days is an extremely short time given the measures needed to acquire such projects. They even go to the extent to say the order could end up in court, like past directives. It’s conflicting and controversial, but the quality of human life and the environment should be prioritized over industrial needs.

So, do we think this order will continue? Are there other orders that fly right past us and go unheard? How can we emphasize the importance of NEPA? What can we do?

How can we become involved in a situation that literally removes us from the picture?

1. Stay updated with politicians that discuss topics involving climate change, or any news at all! It’s important to stay up to date with events because our government is supposed to be somewhat influenced by us.

2. Vote, or register to vote! In order to make a change, sometimes we have to be the change. We’re given the opportunity to have an influence on our government, so why wouldn’t we use it to the most efficient extent?

3. Study or research certain topics that you’re interested in. If policing in America is a topic you’re constantly googling, try taking a criminal justice class to really understand specific content! If racism or sexism is constantly in your search history, try sociology and open your mind to new perspectives!

4. Sign petitions & support organizations that protect acts like NEPA.

https://protectnepa.org/take-action/

https://abcbirds.org/action/petition-nepa

https://secure.foodandwateraction.org/act/stop-nepa-rollback

https://www.change.org/p/council-of-environmental-quality-oppose-the-ceq-1-10-20-proposed-rulemaking-gutting-nepa


Thanks For Reading!

Please contact me via email or social media with any questions, comments, or concerns about the recent order made to waive important environmental reviews! Share this article on your platforms to help bring awareness and attention to this order since it’s clearly been pushed far under the radar. It’s important for us to be included and have a voice, so use yours!


Sources used:

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/04/870098279/trump-waives-environmental-reviews-citing-pandemic-economic-emergency

https://grijalva.house.gov/press-releases/chair-grijalva-trump-administration-changes-to-nepa-implementation-are-illegal-more-about-protecting-polluters-than-listening-to-the-public/

https://protectnepa.org/take-action/

Image sources:

https://m.csindy.com/TheWire/archives/2020/06/10/trump-waives-environmental-laws

9 thoughts on “Why Did This Order From Trump Go Unnoticed? : Trump Waives Important Environmental Reviews

  1. Maddie, many thanks for sharing this. While the president’s antics keep us distracted, we lose sight of his stealing the children’s candy, in this case, a safe environment. There have been a number of roll backs and attempted roll backs of regulations to protect the environment and speak to climate change action. As an independent voter, I was well aware of the untruthfulness and bullying of candidate Trump, but what scared me most was a federal fall back on climate change and environmental degradation.

    Our country has made strides in spite of Trump with cities, states and companies making progress and the fact even Trump cannot stop the move away from coal energy as renewable costs have dropped beneath the cost of coal picking up where natural gas started the coal decline. But, he has done corporate bidding on par with what VP Dick Cheney did under the second Bush to make it easier to bypass environmental regulation.

    What his followers do not realize is Trump has done much of his heavy lifting to benefit the wealthy and industry in our country. The fact he has been able to hide that fact shows what he does with his distractions. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much for your incredible insights! I completely agree. I can’t comprehend why industries consistently maintain more power than other crucial factors of our world. We need to focus on improving the quality within human life, not the quantity of money flowing throughout industries. When taking away critical processes of environmental regulations, many lives of humans and nature are in danger. So, that leads to the final question of how our president could prioritize these businesses rather than human life? Thank you for reading again! We hope for a better future!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Maddie, this is why industry funds candidates. It is not a gift, but an investment. With that said, industries have customers and employees. The more altruistic ones will try to be good community citizens, but many are not. So, the way to make them pay attention is to stop buying their products. This is a key reason many are supporting the Black Lives Matter movement more so than before, to keep customers and employees.

        I recognize I am belittling the effort of the more consistently good-minded companies, in part, so let me share there is a great business book called “Built to Last,” that compared the traits of the nineteen identified best companies whose performance dwarfed their best competitors’. One of those traits is “be more than profits.” In other words, these nineteen companies were good community citizens, whose goodwill would tide them over when they made mistakes.

        Thanks again, Keith

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Here is a couple of what I think.
    1. Trump hates anything that Obama did or has his approval. Remember, it did not take Trump long to pull out of the Paris Accord. Again, it was Obama that signed that treaty.
    2. Trump wants to turn America back to the days where there was no regulations. Where the black person has no rights, no vote.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Interesting insights! I choose to try and avoid strong political bias on my blog but I care so much for the environment that I figured this would be important to share! Thank you so much for reading and sharing your thoughts!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s